Graham & Peter Meeting
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44eaa/44eaa07a724814d2964a015786590c5912fee686" alt="Fig 1"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3243d/3243d208a71b0c64dc293bac00cf08910a0e694c" alt="image"
Fig 1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31d27/31d271ac8c9fd9f0c57f3505613bea8fa56a0c1e" alt="Fig 2"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3243d/3243d208a71b0c64dc293bac00cf08910a0e694c" alt="image"
Fig 2
- Decided that bootstrapping against fixed model parameters would be more difficult to interpret, Fig 1.
- Simulated data results with refitting seem strange (Fig. 2), perhaps related to fitting of the tree. Observed LR for data should at least remain symmetric, so something has gone wrong.
- Expected pattern should be deducible simply by upper left triangle of graphs, should accept the first model where the data becomes typical.