Interesting discussion on the Reproducible Research Group about rates at which the various reproducible research standards are used in the Journal of Biostatistics:
from unknown, 2010, which provides a great basis for recommendations to authors, publishers, and funders to ensure reproducible research. Victoria Stodden describes two journals with Open Review and two with Associate Editors of Reproducible Research.
Some of the articles from Biostatistics discussing this practice: (Baker et. al. 2010), (Goodman, 2010), (Keiding, 2010), (Donoho, 2010), (Groves, 2010) (Peng, 2009)
References
Baker S, Darke A, Pinsky P, Parnes H and Kramer B (2010). “Transparency And Reproducibility in Data Analysis: The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.” Biostatistics, 11. ISSN 1465-4644, https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxq004.
Goodman S (2010). “Commentary.” Biostatistics, 11. ISSN 1465-4644, https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxq030.
Keiding N (2010). “Reproducible Research And The Substantive Context.” Biostatistics, 11. ISSN 1465-4644, https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxq033.
Donoho D (2010). “an Invitation to Reproducible Computational Research.” Biostatistics, 11. ISSN 1465-4644, https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxq028.
Groves T (2010). “The Wider Concept of Data Sharing: View From The Bmj.” Biostatistics, 11. ISSN 1465-4644, https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxq031.
Peng R (2009). “Reproducible Research And Biostatistics.” Biostatistics, 10. ISSN 1465-4644, https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxp014.
Reproducible Research, unknown unknown, (2010) Computing in Science & Engineering, 12 10.1109/MCSE.2010.113